Pages

Sunday, September 30, 2007

I see gay people

It was inevitable that someone would come forward (or should I say out) to dispute the claim by Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, that there are no lesbians or gays in Iran. We are, as the saying goes, everywhere!

Reza, a 29-year-old Iranian, knows the truth … he is gay.

Leaning back in his black leather desk chair at home in Tehran, he said there were, in fact, plenty of gay men and women in Iran. The difference between their lives and those of gays in Europe and North America is one of recognition and legitimacy.

“You can have a secret gay life as long you don’t become an activist and start demanding rights,” he said, speaking on the condition that his family name not be used because he feared retribution.

Reza, who shaves his head and often wears an earring in his left ear, has lived in Europe extensively. Gay life in Iran, he said, “is just complicated in the same way that it is for other groups, like workers and feminists, who don’t have many rights.”

It seems we have much in common with our Iranian brothers and sisters. Religious right leaders, in and outside of Congress, work tirelessly to deny basic civil rights to lesbians and gays in the US. And some religious leaders on the right have gone so far as to say gay people should be executed, but given our form of government should have the benefit of a trial first.

For a country that is said to have no homosexuality, Iran goes to great lengths to ban it. Gays are punished by lashing or death if it is proved that they have had homosexual relations. Two gay teenagers were executed in 2005 in Mashad, a northeastern city.

Fear of persecution is so strong that some gay men and lesbians have sought and received asylum in Western countries.

The Iranian Student News Agency reported in 2005 that a lesbian had been killed in prison by other inmates whom, it was alleged, she had forced to have sex with her.
Lesbians and gays in the US are subjected to similar kinds of violence. Who can forget the violent beating of Matthew Shepard, or the rape and murder of Brandon Teena, a transgender person who simply wanted to live life on his own terms.

How ironic that Brandon might not have met such a tragic death, had he lived in Iran.

Iran has also taken the unusual step of encouraging sex change operations for those with homosexual tendencies. While religious authorities here view homosexuality a clear sin, transsexuals are considered ill and in need of the help that such an operation can provide.
While I would argue that homosexual and transgender are not the same, I would think Brandon would have welcomed the surgery over death.

What is disturbing about this, however, is that apparently some gay men in Iran are actually undergoing surgery so they ”could be recognized by the government as transsexual and mingle with men more easily.”

How tragic it is that anyone would feel compelled to mutilate their body, in order to live an authentic life. And while it is much easier to be lesbian or gay here, we are still living in a glass house.

Checking out a possible new home

I've spent most of the weekend moving content from this blog site, to a new and maybe improved (we'll see) site. I'll be cross posting until I make up my mind about where to finally land.


In the mean time, check out the new Yikes! and tell me what you think!

Sunday Funnies



Saturday, September 29, 2007

WAR: good for profiteers, bad for everyone else

Greedy war profiteers are poised to further line their pockets as they launch a new campaign to push the United States into war with Iran. A new advocacy group, Freedom's Watch, will sponsor a private forum of "20 experts on radical Islam" that is expected to make the case that Iran poses a direct threat to the security of the United States. The alleged "experts" have close ties to the White House.

Freedom’s Watch, a deep-pocketed conservative group led by two former senior White House officials, made an audacious debut in late August when it began a $15 million advertising campaign designed to maintain Congressional support for President Bush’s troop increase in Iraq.

Founded this summer by a dozen wealthy conservatives, the nonprofit group is set apart from most advocacy groups by the immense wealth of its core group of benefactors, its intention to far outspend its rivals and its ambition to pursue a wide-ranging agenda. Its next target: Iran policy.
The organization formed in response to MoveOn.org. Since the group is organized as a tax-exempt organization, it doesn't have to reveal its donors -- but clearly a few dozen conservative CEO's with very deep pockets think their point of view should trump the point of view of more than 3.3 million MoveOn.com members

For years, the group’s founders lamented MoveOn’s growing influence, derived in large part from its grass-roots efforts, especially on the debate about the Iraq war. “A bunch of us activists kept watching MoveOn and its attacks on the war, and it just got to be obnoxious,” said Mr. Sembler, a friend of Vice President Dick Cheney.
So a war started on the basis of a lie isn't "obnoxious" -- but bringing it to the public's attention is! I guess if you are going to make money on the backs of our fighting men and women, it would make sense to try and extend the war for as long as possible.
[The group] denies coordinating its activities with the White House, although many of its donors and organizers are well connected to the administration, including Ari Fleischer, the former White House press secretary.
Bradley Blakeman, the president of Freedom’s Watch, is a former deputy assistant to Mr. Bush.
Mr. Blakeman denied the accusation that Freedom’s Watch is a White House front group. “I don’t need their help,” he said of his former colleagues at the White House. “I don’t seek their help. And they don’t offer it.” Mr. Blakeman is a long-time friend of Ed Gillespie, the new counselor to Mr. Bush who succeeded Dan Bartlett. Mr. Blakeman said that he spoke frequently with Mr. Gillespie, but that they were careful not to discuss the activities of Freedom’s Watch.
And neo-con Republicans have the nerve to call Democrates "elite." They invented the term!

So there you have it. A small number of billionaires are planning to buy enough television and advertising time to try and "sell" the American public on going to war with Iran. And why? Not because there is any imminent threat from Iran, but because it's good for business to keep this country at war.

The president said this week he will veto the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), because Congress raised the total amount from about $5 billion to $12 billion annually for the next five years. It's okay to bloat the pentagon budget, but funding for health care for children is excessive.

And while we are on the topic of money, Bush did sign a bill to prevent a government shutdown, but not without taking a jab at Congressional Democrats.
"Congress failed in its most basic responsibility," the president said in his weekly radio address.

The bills are tied up because Democrats want to add $23 billion for domestic programs to Bush's $933 billion request for the approximately one-third of the federal budget funded by the yearly spending bills. Bush has threatened vetoes on most of the bills, eager to re-establish his party's reputation as the place to go for fiscal discipline.

The president said Democrats are planning the "biggest tax increase in American history" to pay for the new spending.

"Earlier this year congressional leaders promised to show that they could be responsible with the people's money," he said. "Unfortunately they seem to have chosen the path of higher spending."

Democrats say their spending add-ons are relatively modest given the overall size of the budget and in comparison with Bush's pending $189 billion request for Pentagon operations in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008. And most of the additional money, Democrats say, simply restores cuts proposed by Bush to popular programs such as community development grants, health research and anti-crime initiatives.
So here it is folks ... Congress is out of control ... and only the President can reign in their irresponsible spending habits. AND, he will have assistance selling his new profit-making venture -- war with Iran -- with the help of a few billionaires.

Good grief!

McCain says Constitution established a 'Christian Nation'

Good grief, McCain

A recent poll found that 55 percent of Americans believe the U.S. Constitution establishes a Christian nation. What do you think?

I would probably have to say yes, that the Constitution established the United States of America as a Christian nation. But I say that in the broadest sense. The lady that holds her lamp beside the golden door doesn't say, “I only welcome Christians.” We welcome the poor, the tired, the huddled masses. But when they come here they know that they are in a nation founded on Christian principles.

tristero, at Hullabaloo, believes otherwise:
The Despicable John McCain



h/t tristero

Friday, September 28, 2007

Jena 6 DA thanks Jesus for averting disaster

I have not written much about the Jena 6, but it is certainly an issue that has been on my mind. It's such a clear example of the racism that exists in this country. To think otherwise, is to be blind to reality.

If you are a believer, it borders on blasphemy for the DA to invoke Jesus into this case.



What I find truly sad about all this is the utter silence from the white clergy in the community. They have aligned themselves with the white community, to the detriment of the community they so often CLAIM to represent, which is "ALL of God's children."

As someone who does not attend worship services, but who was exposed briefly during my youth to the Christian faith, I do recall one song that clearly these pastors have forgotten. It's the only song I remember from my one and only week of Sunday school: "Jesus loves the little children, all the children of the world. Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight, Jesus loves the little children of the world."

If anyone feels a need to invoke the name of Jesus in this case, let it be to pray for justice for the Jena 6.

Travel on the cheap

Photo by Bill Thompson III
Feel like going to the Amazon but can't afford the airfare or the time off? I have a great travel-on-the-cheap tip for you: Hitch a ride with Bill of the Birds. It'll be a trip to remember.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Happy Birthday Janeane Garofalo

I thought I like Janeane ... but Dr. Zaius has
me beat by a mile. Check out his tribute to Janeane Garofalo.



H/t to tristero at Hullabaloo

Verizon caves to pressure from activists!

Two Victories in One Day! First the hate crimes bill in the Senate, and now this! GREAT! I just received the following message from NARAL Pro-Choice America:

Dear BAC,

I knew that with your help we'd prevail.

Just a few hours ago the CEO of Verizon Wireless faxed me a letter confirming what you may have already heard: his corporation has reversed its "dusty internal policy" that blocked its customers from receiving text-messages they requested from us!

This was a massive victory. Our members, activists, bloggers, Capitol Hill, and other concerned citizens all joined in pressuring Verizon to reverse this decision. In just two hours you sent more than 20,000 messages to Verizon officials! This was a tremendous testament to our combined strength. Thank you!

It's ironic that when we sent a text message last week, the subject was Bush's global gag rule.

While our domestic "gag rule" may now be cleared up with the Verizon corporation, there are still women around the world who don’t receive the information they request because the Bush administration censors international family-planning groups' free speech.

We didn't let Verizon get away with its outrageous policy - don't let Bush get away with his! Please take action today.

Thank you again for your support - we couldn't have won without you.

My best,
Nancy Keenan
President
NARAL Pro-Choice America

P.S. We'll keep the pressure on Verizon until we see its new public policy in writing!

Let's keep the pressure on!

UPDATE: Hate Crimes Bill PASSED

The Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed the U.S. Senate today by a vote of 60 - 39. This legislation will make valuable resources available to the states to investigate and prosecute bias-related crimes against the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

Bush has threatened to veto the bill, and if he does we need all 60 votes for an override! Check here to find out how your Senators voted. Thank them if they voted "Yea" and voice your disaproval if they voted "Ney." Encourage them to hold strong against any veto threat!

Interview with a RAPTOR

A while back, Susan of Susan Gets Native fame agreed to let me interview her. Her busy schedule made it oh so difficult for us to meet over cocktails at Sardi's, but her people finally got with my people, and we were able to do lunch and chat.

And now, exclusively on beginningtobird, presented live and in color and in NibbleVision, it's Susan... Gets... Native! Let's give her a nice round of applause, folks!

Susan, welcome to beginningtobird. You list your occupation as "Director of Education, RAPTOR Inc." How'd you get this gig? Is it an 8-5 thing, plus an hour for lunch? How would one apply for such a position?



I got the gig at RAPTOR thus: I started volunteering on Saturdays, when all the cleaning and feeding take place. Someone has to clean the cages we keep our live mice colony, someone has to pick up all the "leftover" food in the birds' mews (cages), someone has to then clean the mews with a rake and hose, and then someone has to feed all the birds. Anyway, during one Saturday, I asked about the educational programs RAPTOR does, and when I heard how cool it sounded, I said it was interesting to me. Turns out that the current director was leaving, because he had found a "real" job teaching, so the position was going to be open. So they trained me to handle the birds and gave me a basic outline for programs. I shadowed the director a few times, held the birds, got comfortable, and I have now done a few hundred programs! It's not an 8 to 5 thing...it's whenever the requester wants it. I have done programs at 8 am and also at midnight. To apply for such a position, I guess you could contact a rescue/rehab center and do it like I did...get your feet wet in the organization and display a distinct interest.


What's the strangest/funniest thing you've found out about raptors?





General facts are not funny, exactly, but there are funny stories about some of our education birds. Earl the turkey vulture, for example, has escaped twice, and has flown up to the nunnery that is near RAPTOR and tapped on the windows, frightening the nuns. They called us and Earl was easily recaptured. Earl is fully flighted, but is a human imprint (she thinks she is a person) She was brought in after someone had removed her from her nest as a baby, and tried to raise her by feeding her raw hamburger and chicken breast. She was very thin when she was brought in, so it was assumed she was a male. And a few years later, she laid an egg. So we knew she was a female, but the name Earl stuck.


Tell us about this whole "gets native" thing -- is it hard? Do you still have to mow the lawn?



Get native...my favorite subject, other than birds of prey!
Why are native plants important? They are food sources for other native organisms, like birds. They have evolved along side these animals, and are perfectly adapted to survive and thrive in their native environment. You rarely have to water them, you don't have to fertilize them. I have a "prairie" in the back yard, planted with mostly native plants...a few exotics have raised their heads, but I kept them because they have seeds for birds.
I do mow the lawn, but the total area is lessened because a third of the back yard is the prairie. We also keep the corners "brushy" and we build brush piles along the borders of our property to provide cover for small birds and mammals. We don't use ANY weed killer, pesticides or fertilizer. All those things have a way of NOT staying where you put them and they eventually end up in our water supply via lakes and rivers. Did you know that fertilizer can kill off the entire fish population in a pond? The fertilizer runs into the pond, causing an algae bloom, which sucks up all the oxygen and sunlight and the fish die by suffocation.
Our yard has been host to these mammals,snakes, amphibians and birds:
Deer mice
Field mice
Chipmunks
Gray squirrels
White-tailed deer
Opossums
Raccoons
Meadow voles
Eastern brown snakes
Black rat snakes
Cope's gray tree frogs
Green frogs
Bullfrogs
And about 40 species of bird....all in just under an acre of land! I am rather proud of that.


Where did you grow up? Did you always want to be a raptorologist educator person?

I grew up in Bright, Indiana. I wanted to be a marine biologist, a vet, a rock star....I never thought I would be doing this for a living. But it's not like the money is all that good. It helps, though.




Have you ever been bitten or injured by a bird? (either on the job or not)


I have been bitten, scratched, pooped and vomited on. The pooping and vomiting was just the birds being themselves (Earl, being a TV, will vomit on you if she doesn't feel like coming withyou and the screech owls use their poop as a defense...it stinks, big time). The biting and scratching were both my fault. Two-Socks, a RT we had, scratched me on my arm, early on, because I wasn't holding him properly. Our male kestrel bit me on my fingers while I was talking to someone in the crowd, and he was perched next to me, and I didn't realize I was standing so close. The program birds don't hurt us out of spite, because they have been treated gently and used for many programs, so they know how to react. It's the REHAB birds you have to watch. We handle them more rough than the ed. birds. And they get pissed.


Well, folks, that's all the time we have today, but let's thank Susan for being with us today and for not bringing a vulture to puke on me!

Peanut Butter Creationists

A hat tip to The Daily Dish for this!

Do you have any idea ...

how I ended up on Sen John Cornyn's email list?



Update from U.S. Senator John Cornyn

September 2007

Dear BAC,

This month, Gen. David Petraeus provided Congress an objective, no-nonsense assessment on Iraq. His report made it clear that the surge is working, and we’re making significant progress. Total attacks and civilian casualties have decreased and Sunni tribal leaders in al Anbar have revolted against al Qaeda. As a result, some American troops are now expected to begin returning home later this year. Our ground mission in Iraq is not open-ended, but our commitment to our national security must be.

The Senate later approved an amendment I introduced reaffirming our “support for all the men and women of the United States Armed Forces, including General David H. Petraeus,” and repudiating “the unwarranted personal attack on General Petraeus by the liberal activist group MoveOn.org.” This underscores an important precedent adhered to by previous generations of leaders in both political parties: efforts to impugn the integrity of our commanders and troops in the field during war time—in pursuit of partisan political purposes—should be rejected.

Good grief!

Now this sounds like fun

Ever get tired of just watching the debates, and never having a chance to get your opinion in front of the candidates? Well all that is about to change.

MySpace/MTV Presents A Presidential Dialogue with the Candidates.

H/t to georgia10

MySpace has teamed up with MTV to host a series of Presidential Candidate Dialogues which they say are "the first truly interactive" political dialogues. The plan? Well, it goes beyond YouTube questions. Coupling technology with some bold planning, the dialogues will permit users to (1) submit real-time questions to the candidate, and (2) rate a candidate's response to individual questions.

For the first time, users at home or anywhere online are empowered to immediately respond to candidate discourse with a new online polling widget powered by Flextor. Online viewers on MySpace.com or MTV.com will be able to access a simple ratings meter to indicate their approval or disapproval of a candidate's response as they watch the Dialogue live with instant results displayed on the screen. A "popular vote" function will allow viewers to compare their opinions against those of the entire viewing community. Poll results will be available online live during each event and archived for future viewing.

Options for approval ratings include:

* I agree
* Well argued
* Sincere/authentic
* All of the above

Options for disapproval ratings include:

* I disagree
* Full of bull
* Scripted/canned
* All of the above
Viewers will also be able to submit real-time questions to candidates via MySpace's instant messaging client.

The concept is fascinating. Simply put, it's like live-blogging in the candidate's face. Now that sounds like fun.

John Edwards is the first one up to try the new format, with future forums being scheduled for all major candidates on both sides of the aisle. The event is taking place today at 12:00 ET at the University of New Hampshire campus. The debate will stream live on both MySpaceTV and MTV.com, and it will also be broadcast on MTV later in the day.

Check it out!

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Verizon Censors Abortion Rights Group

Anyone who needs a living example of why net neutrality is important only need look at what happened to NARAL Pro-Choice America.

The New York Times reports:

Saying it had the right to block “controversial or unsavory” text messages, Verizon Wireless has rejected a request from Naral Pro-Choice America, the abortion rights group, to make Verizon’s mobile network available for a text-message program. [...]

Text messaging is a growing political tool in the United States and a dominant one abroad, and such sign-up programs are used by many political candidates and advocacy groups to send updates to supporters.

But legal experts said private companies like Verizon probably have the legal right to decide which messages to carry. The laws that forbid common carriers from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary phone lines do not apply to text messages. [...]

In turning down the program, Verizon, one of the nation’s two largest wireless carriers, told Naral that it does not accept programs from any group “that seeks to promote an agenda or distribute content that, in its discretion, may be seen as controversial or unsavory to any of our users.” Naral provided copies of its communications with Verizon to The New York Times.

So what was the "unsavory" message NARAL wanted to send? An appeal to their activists to contact Congress and urge an end to Bush's global gag rule against birth control for the world’s poorest women. Keep in mind the message was going to people who SIGNED UP TO RECEIVE TEXT MESSAGES.

“No company should be allowed to censor the message we want to send to people who have asked us to send it to them,” Ms. Keenan said. “Regardless of people’s political views, Verizon customers should decide what action to take on their phones. Why does Verizon get to make that choice for them?” [...]

Messages urging political action are generally thought to be at the heart of what the First Amendment protects. But the First Amendment limits government power, not that of private companies like Verizon.

Contact Verizon and urge them to stop censoring advocacy messages. Then contact your members of Congress and urge them to support net neutrality!

TAKE ACTION: Senate to Vote on Hate Crimes Bill

The Senate is finally going to vote on the Matthew Shepard Act on Thursday (9/27).

Now that Senate action is imminent, anti-LGBT groups are activating their misinformed grassroots base once again.

They've convinced thousands that this bill will muzzle preachers and send pastors to jail for reading certain parts of the Bible. This is simply NOT TRUE. If we don't call right now, critical votes COULD BE LOST to these scare tactics.

TAKE ACTION NOW
Click here to get contact information for you Senators.

For each office, tell the staffer who answers:
"As a constituent, I'd like the Senator to support the Matthew Shepard Act (S. 1105)."

We cannot allow our Senators to be intimidated, misled, or swayed by an extremist minority.

Bumbling Bush

Candidate Bush once asked, "Is our children learning?" He answered that question today with, "Childrens do learn." Before you ask ... yes, he was speaking at an education event -- desperately trying to sell No Child Left Behind.

The WaPo reports:

The setting was, yes, an education event where the president was taking credit for rising test scores and promoting congressional renewal of his signature education law. To create the right image, he summoned the city's school chancellor, a principal, some teachers and 20 eager students from P.S. 76. [...]

His latest misstatement masked a serious issue, of course. As Bush's first-term No Child Left Behind law comes up for reauthorization, critics in Congress are attacking it from both left and right. The president is trying to preserve what he sees as one of his most significant domestic achievements. The latest report card released by the National Assessment of Educational Progress gave him some ammunition. [...]

Democratic lawmakers offered a more measured assessment of the results and saw them as justification for modifying No Child Left Behind. Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), a key player on education legislation, said, "With an improved law and better funding, I believe that we will see much stronger achievement gains among all students."

Someone please check the countdown clock (in the sidebar) and let me know when I can resurface. I'm not sure how much more of Bush I can take.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Janeane Rocks




H/t to Blue Gal. I watched the program, but didn't realize the clip was available. I'm a big fan of Janeane Garofalo.

GOP hypocrisy


H/t to DCup for this, and her excellent post.
David Shuster, who was filling in for Tucker Carlson on MSNBC tonight, really interviewed Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) who came on to repeat Republican talking points about the MoveOn.org ad in the New York Times. See, the Republican pro-war folks still want to talk about the NY Times ad, not the war.

Check it out!

Monday, September 24, 2007

Is there a connection?

The dollar is shrinking, people are losing their homes, the UAW has called a nationwide strike for the first time in 37 years, and there is a steep rise in violent crime. Gee, do you think there could be a connection?

Violent crime in the United States rose more than previously believed in 2006, continuing the most significant increase in more than a decade, according to an FBI report released yesterday.

The FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program found that robberies surged by 7.2 percent and homicides rose 1.8 percent from 2005 to 2006. Violent crime overall rose 1.9 percent, substantially more than an increase of 1.3 percent estimated in a preliminary FBI report in June.

The jump was the second in two years, following a 2.3 percent rise in 2005. Taken together, the two years represent the first steady increase in violent crime since 1993, FBI records show.

The uptick presents a significant political challenge for the Bush administration, which has faced growing criticism from congressional Democrats, big-city mayors and police chiefs for presiding over cuts in federal assistance to local law enforcement agencies over the past six years.

I'll let you decide.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

In Memoriam - Marcel Marceau


Marcel Marceau, 84, the world's greatest mime who
single-handedly revived the ancient art with his
eloquent but wordless interpretations of complex
emotions, died quietly in Paris Sept. 22.
No cause of death was reported.

Why I hate "politically correct"

If I hear the words “politically correct” one more time I might throw up. I’m sure this phrase wasn’t coined by a liberal/progressive person or group. It’s a tool often used by right wing conservatives to try and silence, or at least marginalize, anyone who expresses an opinion they disagree with. But what I think is even MORE egregious is when alleged progressives use it as a weapon against other progressives.

I will not name names here, but this post was prompted by something I just read regarding Sally Field and FOX network. I’m not going to “out” the author, because I have met and like them – but I think their post is playing directly into a divide and conquer strategy that has worked so effectively for the Bush/Cheney/Rove political machine.

I don’t give a fuck whether or not anyone thinks Ms. Fields is an appropriate spokesperson for the anti-war movement. The bottom line is that she has as much right to voice her opinion about the war as anyone.

If I’m against the war, and I want that sentiment express in public as often as possible, does that make me “politically correct?”

If I think the Jena 6 are getting screwed by the justice system, and the actions against them are steeped in racism, does that make me “politically correct?”

If I think women should make decisions about their reproductive health care, instead of Congress and the President, does that make me “politically correct?”

If I think couples in love should have the right to be legally married, regardless of their sexual orientation, does that make me “politically correct?”

And if I think everyone in this country has a right to affordable healthcare, an opportunity for a decent education, and should receive a living wage for the work they do, does that make me “politically correct?”

If it does … then sign me the fuck up now! And if you don’t like it … that’s too fucking bad.

I do believe the adage “if you’re not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.” If you claim to be anything OTHER than a neo-con, and you are baiting people with the “politically correct” tag … you are part of the problem.

Sunday Funnies






Happy Birthday Ani


"We have to be able to criticise what we love, to say what we have to say 'cause if your not trying to make something better, than as far as I can tell, you are just in the way."
- Ani DiFranco

Saturday, September 22, 2007

The Dollar in Decline


Any questions?



good grief!

In Memoriam - Alice Ghostley

Alice Ghostley, the Tony Award-winning actress best known on television for playing Esmeralda on "Bewitched" and Bernice on "Designing Women," has died. She was 81. [...]

From 1969 to 1972, she played the good witch and ditzy housekeeper Esmeralda on TV's "Bewitched." She played Bernice Clifton on "Designing Women" from 1987 to 1993, for which she earned an Emmy nomination in 1992.

Ghostley's film credits include "To Kill a Mockingbird," "The Graduate," "Gator" and "Grease."

A must read


DCup has hit one out of the park with
this post. I encourage you to stop
whatever you are doing and check it out:

Never Enough Strip Clubs and Gin Joints

Saturday afternoon music break


The Ramones - Pinhead



The Ramones - I wanna be sedated

To be a buzzard

Yesterday when I was leaving work, I saw a turkey vulture flying very low over the grassy area near the back of the parking lot; he couldn't have been more than 25 feet off the ground. This is the closest I've ever come to a TV, so I hopped in the car and drove nearer back there, trying to watch him as I went (maybe 100 yards). He was alone, as far as I could see, and I don't know if I scared him or what, but he kinda drifted back farther toward the road and away from me, still flying low. I had to keep my eye on him from crazy angles inside the car (through the windshield and the side windows and the moon roof), and in that time, the TV disappeared. I mean, he absolutely vanished. There was no place for him to hide; I didn't see him on the ground or in the small trees. He just vanished! I was bummed, both that I didn't have my camera and that I might've scared him off of some food source he'd found.

I drove away, trying to get a broader non-car-blocked view of the area, and he was still just gone. I don't know where he went, but he went there FAST.

To me, turkey vultures are both beautiful and somewhat repellent. As Linda mentioned in a comment on the Power Bird quiz post, vultures in flight are quite beautiful: large, with a broad wingspan and delicate fingerlike primary feathers spread out at the wing tips. They rarely flap their wings, instead just floating along on wind currents. Whenever Kat and I are driving somewhere and I see a turkey vulture, I always say, "Look, an eagle! Soaring majestically! ... in a circle!" It's our little birding joke, because I always used to make every large bird into an eagle to make it seem more exciting and because I'd never actually seen an eagle yet.

TVs (I've never seen a black vulture, so I'm limiting my discussion to turkey vultures) always seem to fly so slowly, preferring to drift instead of actively flap their wings to get someplace. It looks like they go where the wind takes them, stopping only when they get that scent: the scent of death. This is where the "somewhat repellent" part comes in, but still I'm fascinated. I read in one of my forensic science books that vultures (and some insects) can smell death even before it comes. What exactly is it that they smell--blood? I can understand that, because blood emits a powerful scent to a predator; but sometimes an animal's injuries are internal or he's just sick and dying, so there's no blood. How do the vultures find that animal out there in the vast expanses of a desert or a valley and thus begin their circling dance? My forensic science book didn't say how the animals and insects did it, just that they can.

How does it work? What it is about a flying vulture that can sense death miles away, float toward it on the wind, and then circle above it until (gulp) it happens?

Why Should God Bless America ... and other Republican Questions

Friday, September 21, 2007

Memo to Democrats

What a week it has been, watching our Democracy continue to crumble. I will let these fine voices elaborate on my frustration.

Taylor Marsh offers these comments:
Before a single Democrat condemns MoveOn's ad, they should insist that George W. Bush and the Republican Party repudiate the anti-military smears on war heroes that have been the hallmark of Mr. Bush's political career. ... - Paul Begala
A little good old political theater is what was in order today. Senate majority leader Harry Reid should have gathered Democrats together and when the Cornyn amendment came up they all should have walked out. Then on the Capitol steps Reid should have given a short speech on Republicans voting against the Webb amendment, which actually aided the troops, and that while soldiers are dying in battle he would not allow the Senate to be used for a political show. Not on his watch. End tape. [...]

One congressman from California showed more spine than Edwards and Obama
combined.
"I commend MoveOn for their ad and for speaking truth to power," said Stark. "Up is not down, the earth is not flat, and the surge is not working. General Petraeus betrayed his own reputation by standing with George Bush in opposition to the timely withdrawal of all of our brave men and women from Iraq. I thank MoveOn for their patriotic ad and call on Petraeus to help Bush end a war the President should have never started." - Pete Stark
Jane Hamsher at firedoglake adds this:

The only one who got this right was Hillary Clinton. She’s been on the receiving end of mock right wing outrage before, she knows how it works and she didn’t get played by the typical GOP charade that even THEY aren’t sincere about. Every word coming out of their mouths on the floor of the Senate this morning was pure santcimonious hypocrisy, dancing on the head of a pin as they tried to distinguish between this and the outrageous things it was perfectly okay to say about Abizaid or Kerry or Max Clelland. But thanks to the willingness of human Gumby dolls like Bill Richardson, Barack Obama and John Edwards who thought it best to bow down before the right wing when it gets its bluster on, the PR blitz nobody would have otherwise cared about kept gaining momentum until it reached this shocking abrogation of free speech with the help of 25 Democrats.

I should actually qualify that — it wasn’t Edwards who bagged MoveOn, he had his wife do it. I suppose that’s better somehow. Maybe not as good as Barack “I never met a fight I couldn’t duck” Obama who was there to vote on the Boxer Amendment, but couldn’t be bothered to stick around and vote against Cornyn. But close.
More from Marsh:

Hillary Clinton gets it. Even in the middle of a brutal attack launched by Rudy Giuliani, which will only get worse because of her vote today, Clinton stood up, stood proudly and cast a vote against the Cornyn charade. No doubt she remembers well when Democrats wanted to flee from Bill Clinton during the Lewinski witch hunt. No one sanctioned what her husband did, least of all her. But Hillary knew what was at stake and what Republicans were really after, so she didn't flinch, gathered herself and the Democratic party and fought back against the right-wing who was after only one thing, same as they were today.

Power.

Never give in. Never give up. And above all else know who is the real enemy. Clinton knows -- as sure as she saved Bill Clinton's presidency -- that the enemy of Democrats is not MoveOn.org. Today Clinton proved why she's the frontrunner. She left the boys in the dust.
THE COURAGEOUS 25 WHO VOTED NAY
Akaka (D-HI)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Byrd (D-WV)
Clinton (D-NY)
Dodd (D-CT)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Levin (D-MI)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Murray (D-WA)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

And finally, from The Nation: Democrats Stab MoveOn in the Back

"Memo to Democrats: you control the Congress. That means you can decide what bills come to the floor for votes--and what don't. So why, in a week where Republicans blocked the restoration of habeas corpus, voting rights for DC and adequate rest time for our troops between deployments, did you allow Republicans the opportunity to score a cheap PR stunt by approving a resolution condemning a week-old newspaper ad by Moveon.org--on the same day Republicans once again voted to keep indefinitely continuing the Iraq war?!"
Stay tuned ...

Crosspost for mercy

My blogpal Splotchy has a very new blog called Who's in Charge Here?, on which he posts publicity photos of bands and asks commenters to figure out who in the photo is actually the supposed "leader" of the band. His band choices are always obscure and the band photos are always hilarious: a bunch of uber-sensitive guys looking like the world just misunderstands them, or quirky neo-punk weirdos with bad hair and makeup, etc. You can tell the photographer (probably one of the bandmembers' significant others or something) was trying to "make a statement" for the band, pose them in such a way that you just couldn't resist the urge to buy their CD so you could hear about the emotions pulsing underneath that glossy surface.

The latest band is a two-woman outfit called Peach Candy. Only four people have commented on who's in charge, so Splotchy hasn't updated with the answer. (He waits for sufficient table-talk to have occurred.) Well, I'm DYING here, people! I gotta know if I picked the right one! So for a good time, head on over to Who's in Charge Here?

Things are great in Iraf

In The Know: Everything Is Great In Iraf

Today ... Ugh

The dogs woke me up early today, and I made the mistake of turning on the news. I usually watch NBC, so the Today Show was just about to come on. I'm always interested to see what news reports think is the "top" story, because so often my idea is much different from theirs -- and today was no exception.

After the opening music, Matt Lauer began the headlines. The top stories included: Israel attack on Syria, and what the president knew ... the MoveOn.org ad, will it hurt Democrats ... and the latest on Britney Spears and Kevin Federline's divorce.

Of the three, in my opinion there is really only one that is newsworthy -- and it's NOT the latest Britney/Kevin story -- which I quite frankly find annoying. This is a "top story" for what reason?

Clearly, the only story worthy of morning news coverage is the first one.

NBC News doesn't expand it's report on Israel's attack on Syria, because that would involve having to do ACTUAL investigative reporting. And that costs money! The 'bottom line' is more important to NBC than bringing the American public the news.

Next up was the "report" about Petraeus and the Move On ad. Instead of analyzing the testimony of Petraeus for it's accuracy, NBC is focusing on the Move On ad and whether or not it will "hurt" Democrats. And why? Because it would take a little digging to uncover the facts, and again that is more expensive than simply bashing a "liberal" organization for demanding the truth.

In talking about the story, NBC turns to its "expert" on anything Washington -- Tim Russert, who is such an asshole. He twists everything to the president's advantage.

Meredith Viera asked Russert: "You tell me what's happening in Washington. Instead of debating the war it's this discussion of the ad that's overtaking everybody. Why?"

Russert's response: "Ah, because the emphasis is on this ad because the president wants very much to debate the idea of General Petraeus' honor. About whether or not the Democrats like to quote "aggravate" the military. It's an emotional, passionate issue that works, ah and -- an was pointed out in the earlier segment -- half the Democrats, Meredith, particularly those from swing states voted to condemn that ad."

[Note: Russert seemed to be having a lot of trouble putting his word together this morning. Was it just because its early, or is it difficult to talk and tell lies at the same time?]

Meredith: "Well, the head of MoveOn.org said he does not think that the ad has backfired on the Democratic Party, do you agree?"

Russert: "Clearly the vote yesterday indicated a lot of Democrats disagree. Ah, Chuck Hagel who was name was (sic) invoked voted against, ah voted for censoring the ad or condemning the ad. The point is Meredith, Democrats would prefer to be debating the situation on the ground in Iraq -- the presence of 165,000 troops, whether or not they should be redeployed or withdrawn. To be debating the ad, they see as a distraction. The Republicans, on the other hand, see this as going to the core of the debate -- that the Democrats are weak, they want to be very much anti-military, and this is a preferential debate for the Republicans to have."

And if this is the debate the Republicans want, of course NBC and Russert are going to oblige. I wonder how much the White House is paying him for all this propaganda.

Thursday, September 20, 2007

The color for today is ...


Black ... driftglass asked everyone to wear black today -- and even though it's late in the day I wanted to toss in my support. I must have sensed it, because I am wearing something black.

Muxola: Just what the Dr. ordered

I was on Dr. Monkerstein's blog a little while ago, and my word verification was "muxola." What a great word! I'm not sure whether it sounds more like a medicine or a new high-fiber cereal, but I like it. It's now the official -er- product of beginningtobird, whatever the heck it is.

Perhaps it's a baked good:

Perhaps it's something more abstract, and it will save the universe:


Perhaps it's a secret weapon, to be guarded with your life:

What is Muxola?

P.S. Official thanks to Retro Ad Art and Retro Clip Art for not arresting me (yet) for lifting these images.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

OJ overkill



Getting to 60


60 votes, that is the magic number to make anything happen in the United States Senate. Without 60 votes, legislation dealing with Iraq (or any social justice issue) simply cannot pass.

Today the Senate failed to pass two key measures, a vote to require that troops get as much time at home as they spend overseas before being redeployed, and a move to give terrorism suspects the right to challenge their detentions in federal court.

Senate Democrats fell short late this afternoon in what was seen as their best chance to shift the course of the war in Iraq, in a vote on a measure to require that troops get as much time at home as they spend overseas before being redeployed.

The vote on the measure, offered by Senator Jim Webb, Democrat of Virginia, was 56 to 44 in favor — four less than the supporters needed to prevent a filibuster. The outcome was almost the same as that in a vote on the measure in July, when 56 senators voted in favor and 41 against.

Senator Webb and Senator Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, made an aggressive last-ditch push today for the proposal, but to no avail.

“War is hell, but politicians shouldn’t make it any worse,” Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota, said in urging support for the Webb measure.

Sen John McCain argued that the message the president is getting from the troops is "Let us win." and Sen. John Warner, who had indicated he "endorsed" the measure, also said he intended to "vote against it."

In explaining his decision, Mr. Warner said he had been persuaded, at a meeting earlier in the day with senior military officials, that the Webb plan could not be carried out without causing havoc for the armed forces, potentially lengthening soldiers’ tours in Iraq.
Digby has an excellent post about Warner.

A move to give terrorism suspects the right to challenge their detentions in federal court fell short, even though it had majority support.

Fifty-six senators voted to cut off debate, and move forward to a vote on the bill itself, a step known as cloture. But under Senate rules, 60 votes are needed to invoke cloture. [...]

“The truth is that casting aside the time-honored protection of habeas corpus makes us more vulnerable as a nation because it leads us away from our core American values,” said Senator Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, a co-sponsor of the measure with Senators Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, and Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut. Mr. Leahy is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Mr. Specter the committee’s senior Republican; both are former prosecutors.

The legal concept of habeas corpus (“You have the body” in Latin) dates back to medieval England, and is meant to protect people from being locked up indefinitely without a court review. Last year, Congress passed and President Bush signed an act eliminating the right of habeas corpus for non-Americans who are labeled “enemy combatants” in the continuing campaign against terrorism.

So there you have it. No longer is a simply majority enough to pass legislation out of the Senate, it now takes 60 votes! When did filibuster become the norm? I have written about this in the past, but there is a need to keep saying it -- we MUST vote in 2008, and we MUST elect enough progressive candidates to reach that 60 vote standard if we ever want to see change.

What kind of bird are you?

Your Power Bird is an Owl
You are beyond wise. You are so smart, you're almost prophetic.Your inner voice always speaks the truth, and you take the time to listen to it.You are good at seeing who people are... including the darkness of others.As a result, you tend to have a rather dark - yet realistic - outlook on life.


New reader Gledwood from merrie olde England had a link to this little quiz, and it's fun. It's painless and only takes a minute or so--go check it out. I wanted to answer several of the questions with three or four of the choices, but you're only allowed one choice per question. Otherwise, I might've been some sort of cross-bred freak bird.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Talk Like a Pirate Day

Ahoy, 'tis a fine way t'be speakin' like me matey Cap'n Dyke! A fine lesbian pirate queen she be. Aye, be sure t' stop by her grand ship t' say hello, or I'll be makin' ye walk the plank!

Arrr, har be some links me parrot be offerin' ya:


Smart ... and good looking

L'Oréal Paris International Make-up Artist James Kaliardos was recently interviewed by a London newspaper. "The 5-minute Interview" revealed quite a lot about Kaliardos -- specifically that he supports women's rights and the separation of church and state.

Known for his high-profile clients, including Madonna, Kaliardos also edits 'Visionaire' fashion magazine which he founded.

If I weren't talking to you right now I'd be...

En route to a job, audition or something – walking across New York with my bag and typing into my Blackberry. Generally multi-tasking. [...]

I wish people would take more notice of...

The freedoms being denied to women around the world. I also wish we could change how women are depicted in photographs and films. [...]

I am not a politician but...

I believe in separation between church and state. The blurring of that line in the US is leading to our demise.

In a nutshell, my philosophy is...

Follow your dreams and be kind and considerate to other people.

Well spoken, I'd say!