Pages

Monday, October 31, 2005

Roe Hangs in the Balance


Supreme Court nominee Samual Alito will replace the swing vote on abortion, and he is no friend to women. The 55-year-old Alito has served as a U.S. Court of Appeals Judge for the Third District for the last 15 years. So consistently conservative, Alito has been dubbed "Scalito" or "Scalia-lite" by some lawyers because his judicial philosophy invites comparisons to conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

In the early 1990s, Alito was the lone dissenter in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a case in which the 3rd Circuit struck down a Pennsylvania law that included a provision requiring women seeking abortions to notify their spouses.

"The Pennsylvania legislature could have rationally believed that some married women are initially inclined to obtain an abortion without their husbands' knowledge because of perceived problems - such as economic constraints, future plans or the husbands' previously expressed opposition - that may be obviated by discussion prior to the abortion," Alito wrote.

The case ended up at the Supreme Court where the justices, in a 6-3 decision struck down the spousal notification provision of the law. The late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist cited Alito's reasoning in his own dissent.

Do we really want to turn back the clock and return to the days of unsafe, back alley abortion? Do we want to be part of the generation that both won and lost the right to safe and legal abortion?

In 2004 more than 1.15 million women and men took to the streets in support of reproductive rights for women. It was the largest march in Washington, DC history. Everyone who attended that historic event must contact their Senators to demand that they oppose Samual Alito, or anyone who would restrict reproductive rights.

Sunday, October 30, 2005

Dusting for Prints

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that the administrations fingerprints are all over Plamegate. (See: At Least 7 in Cabinet Knew of Plame's ID) Instead of commenting on what a wonderful public servant Scooter Libby was, the president should have been announcing his resignation, and the resignation of every member of his administration.

Bush promised to bring integrity to the White House and what he has brought is shame. This administration lied to take us to war, and used the full power of the government to try and undermine a critic.

Unlike Watergate or Monicagate, the underlying issue behind Plamegate cost Americans their lives. If Bush/Cheney won't resign, it's time to begin impeachment.

Saturday, October 29, 2005

Rosa Parks to Lie in Honor at Capitol


By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer
Sat Oct 29, 2005

WASHINGTON - In death, Rosa Parks is joining a select few, including presidents and war heroes, accorded a public viewing in the Capitol Rotunda. It's the place where, six years ago, President Clinton and congressional leaders lauded the former seamstress for a simple act of defiance that changed the course of race relations.

On Sunday, Parks becomes the first woman to lie in honor in the vast circular room under the Capitol dome.

The House agreed by voice vote Friday that the body of Parks will lie in honor in the Rotunda on Sunday and Monday "so that the citizens of the United States may pay their last respects to this great American." The Senate approved the resolution Thursday night. (full story)

Friday, October 28, 2005

Why Plamegate is worse than Watergate


We must not forget that the bigger issue regarding the outing of Valerie Plame is whether or not Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and and other high level government officials lied about WMD to justify the Iraq invasion and then conspired to cover up the truth. For that reason, this case is so much bigger than the Watergate scandal of the 1970's. No one died as a result of Watergate, however 2000 U.S. soldiers and 20,000+ Iraqis have died at the hands of the Bush administration. And let's not forget the tens of thousands who have been maimed and wounded.

First Strike ... hopefully more to come

What did he know, and when did he know it? And, who else is involved? These and other questions are still swirling following the indictment of Vice President Chief of Staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Jr.

The grand jury indictment charged Libby with one count of obstruction of justice, two of perjury and two false statement counts. If convicted on all five, he could face as much as 30 years in prison and $1.25 million in fines. (See:
Libby Resigns Amid Perjury and Obstruction Charges By JOHN SOLOMON and PETE YOST, AP)

It's the first time in 135 years that a White House official has been indicted, and it's possible that more indictments are coming. All this from a president who just five years ago pledged to bring integrity to the White House. Instead, we have a White House engulfed in cronyism and corruption.

It's clear that the president mislead, if not outright lied, to the American people to justify invading Iraq. And it's clear that anyone who tried to bring that truth to the American public faced retaliation. The founders gave us a remedy for actions like these ... impeachment.

Thursday, October 27, 2005

Once, I had a secret love ...

National Coming OUT day is celebrated every October 11, but it took a couple of celebrities a few extra days to take the plunge!

This week WNBA basketball great Sheryl Swoopes revealed that she is a lesbian. In interviews with The Advocate, After Ellen, and numerous broadcast media, Swoopes said: "I'm just at a point in my life where I'm tired of having to pretend to be somebody I'm not. I'm tired of having to hide my feelings about the person I care about. About the person I love."

You go girl!!

As one of the superstars of the league and arguably its best spokeperson, Swoopes's decision to come out is a major event in women's sports. It's also worth noting that Swoopes is the first black woman in the WNBA to come out, and one of the only openly gay black female athletes in American professional sports.

Sheryl Swoopes is a tremendous athlete and terrific role model. Her courage will undoubtedly make it easier for other women and girls to finally come out.


Star Trek's Mr. Sulu Comes Out!

George Takei, best known for his role as Mr. Sulu in "Star Trek," came out in the current issue of Frontiers, a magazine covering the Los Angeles gay and lesbian community.

Takei told The Associated Press on Thursday that his new onstage role as psychologist Martin Dysart in "Equus," helped inspire him to publicly discuss his sexuality.

The current social and political climate also motivated Takei's disclosure, he said.

The 68-year-old actor said he and his partner, Brad Altman, have been together for 18 years.

As we wait to hear the fate of officials within the Bush administration it's refreshing to hear news about a George with real courage and family values.

Miers Zero -- Religious Right Won

Make no mistake about it, the Miers withdrawal is not a positive for progressives or even moderate Republicans. While Miers credentials for the Supreme Court were questionable, an administration in this much trouble will most likely select someone much more appealing to their religious right base.

Stay tuned!

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Santorum Anti-Poverty Idea . . . I Do?

Republicans claim to want less government intervention in their lives, but never seem to miss an opportunity to use the power of the government to force their will on the rest of us. Their solution to poverty? For women the solution seems to be 'just get married' -- that will solve your problems. And, men don't need job training or continuing education -- they need classes on how to be a better father. And when all else fails, give more public money to the church!
________________________________________

Santorum eyes GOP anti-poverty effort

By Amy Fagan
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
October 26, 2005

Senate Republican leaders -- criticized by Democrats over their policies toward the poor in the wake of Hurricane Katrina -- will push their own anti-poverty agenda this week to encourage marriage, responsible fatherhood and private charitable giving. (full story)

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Thank you Ms. Parks

Mother of Civil Rights Movement Dies at 92

By BREE FOWLER , AP

DETROIT (Oct. 25) - Nearly 50 years ago, Rosa Parks made a simple decision that sparked a revolution. When a white man demanded she give up her seat on a Montgomery, Ala., bus, the then 42-year-old seamstress said no.


At the time, she couldn't have known it would secure her a revered place in American history. But her one small act of defiance galvanized a generation of activists, including a young Rev. Martin Luther King Jr., and earned her the title "mother of the civil rights movement." (full story)

Monday, October 24, 2005

Will White House Leak Drown Top Officials?

The Most Corrupt Administration in History

UPI is reporting: "The CIA leak inquiry that threatens senior White House aides has now widened to include the forgery of documents on African uranium that started the investigation, according to NAT0 intelligence sources." (full story)

Leaking a CIA agents name is bad ... falsifying information to take a nation to war -- causing the deaths of more than 2,000 U.S. soldiers and thousands in Iraq -- is much worse! Using the power of the federal government to intimidate or attempt to silence critics, to keep the truth from the American public, is exactly why the framers of our Constitution included an impeachment process.

Sunday, October 23, 2005

The Perfect Storm - Miers, Hurricane Katrina, Iraq, Rove, the budget deficit and the DeLay indictment

It Doesn't Get Any Better Than This

Just when Bush thought it couldn't get any worse
UPI reports that the president is "bracing for a powerful new attack by Brent Scowcroft, the respected national security adviser to the first President George Bush."

The report says -- "A Republican and a former Air Force general, Scowcroft is a leading member of the bipartisan foreign policy establishment, and his critique of both of the style and the substance of the Bush White House, is slated to appear in Monday's editions of the New Yorker magazine.

Poor George is sinking in the polls and taking serious flak from his conservative base over the controversial nomination of Harriet Miers to the vacant seat on the Supreme Court. One can only hope the Republicans will continue to be in disarray heading into the 2006 elections.

Miers prep team in too much hot water to help?

Miers' Answer Raises Questions

By David G. Savage
The Los Angeles Times
Saturday 22 October 2005


Legal experts find a misuse of terms in her
Senate questionnaire 'terrible' and 'shocking.'

Washington - Asked to describe the constitutional issues she had worked on during her legal career, Supreme Court nominee Harriet E. Miers had relatively little to say on the questionnaire she sent to the Senate this week.

And what she did say left many constitutional experts shaking their heads.

At one point, Miers described her service on the Dallas City Council in 1989. When the city was sued on allegations that it violated the Voting Rights Act, she said, "the council had to be sure to comply with the proportional representation requirement of the Equal Protection Clause."

But the Supreme Court repeatedly has said the Constitution's guarantee of "equal protection of the laws" does not mean that city councils or state legislatures must have the same proportion of blacks, Latinos and Asians as the voting population.

"That's a terrible answer. There is no proportional representation requirement under the equal protection clause," said New York University law professor Burt Neuborne, a voting rights expert. "If a first-year law student wrote that and submitted it in class, I would send it back and say it was unacceptable."

For the rest of the story click here.

Saturday, October 22, 2005

The Bonnie to Scooter's Clyde?

Woman of Mass Destruction

Judy Miller has certainly been the focus of more than a few reports lately -- all suggesting that being 'embedded' with the administration may have contributed to the thousands of dead and wounded in Iraq.

Maureen Dowd writes that "Judy admitted in the story that she "got it totally wrong" about WMD "If your sources are wrong," she said, "you are wrong." But investigative reporting is not stenography. "

I have been asking for years 'what happened to investigative reporting?' It's nice to see others asking that same question.

Friday, October 21, 2005

"Wheels are coming off the Bush Administration" says Gergen


Is this the beginning of the end for the Bush Administration?

Are conservatives leading the revolt? Check out this video posted to Crooks and Liars: http://movies.crooksandliars.com/cnn_ldt_gergen_wheels_off_gop_051020b.mov

Worse than Watergate

The Most Important Criminal Case in American History

by James Moore

If special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald delivers indictments of a few functionaries of the vice president’s office or the White House, we are likely to have on our hands a constitutional crisis. The evidence of widespread wrongdoing and conspiracy is before every American with a cheap laptop and a cable television subscription. And we do not have the same powers of subpoena granted to Fitzgerald.

We know, however, based upon what we have read and seen and heard that someone created fake documents related to Niger and Iraq and used them as a false pretense to launch America into an invasion of Iraq. And when a former diplomat made an honest effort to find out the facts, a plan was hatched to both discredit and punish him by revealing the identity of his undercover CIA agent wife.

Patrick Fitzgerald has before him the most important criminal case in American history. Watergate, by comparison, was a random burglary in an age of innocence. The investigator’s prosecutorial authority in this present case is not constrained by any regulation. If he finds a thread connecting the leak to something greater, Fitzgerald has the legal power to follow it to the web in search of the spider. It seems unlikely, then, that he would simply go after the leakers and the people who sought to cover up the leak when it was merely a secondary consequence of the much greater crime of forging evidence to foment war. . . .

This post is a MUST READ -- for the rest of the story click here.

Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Plamegate looking more and more like Watergate

Questions for Bush on the Daily News' Rove-told-Bush Revelation

From DavidCorn.com

DavidCorn.com is reporting that Senator Chuck Schumer, (D-NY), is "
fast off the mark on the Rove-told-Bush story." Responding to Daily News reports that Rove told Bush in 2003 that he was involved in the Plame/CIA leak, Schumer sent the following letter to Bush.

Dear Mr. President,

I read today with profound concern news reports that you had conversations with your Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove in 2003 about his role in the leak of Valerie Plame's name. Earlier, of course, the White House issued emphatic and blanket denials of any involvement in the disclosure or confirmation of Ms. Plame's status as a CIA agent to members of the media.

In light of these reports, I urge you to make public the details of Mr. Rove's involvement, your understanding of that involvement, and an explanation as to why Mr. Rove was neither dismissed nor his security clearance revoked when you learned of his participation in the Plame affair.

According to the news account, after the Department of Justice informed the White House that it had launched a criminal investigation, you were "furious" at Mr. Rove for talking to the press about the Plame leak and scolded him about it. Particularly troubling is the allegation that you were not angry at the leak itself, but rather the "clumsy" handling of the leak. In other words, it seems like you may have been angry that White House officials were caught, not that they had compromised national security. If true, this is of course very problematic. As a result, the American people deserve to hear the facts immediately as to those conversations.

In light of these reports, and the fact that you long ago promised to fire anyone involved in the leak, I urge you to immediately and publicly clear up the record. If it is true that you had conversations with Mr. Rove about his involvement in talking to the press about the identity of Valerie Plame, a covert agent with the CIA, the American people deserve to know the answers to several questions. Among them are these:

* How often did you have conversations with Karl Rove about the Plame leak and on what dates?

* Did these conversations take place after you learned that the Department of Justice had initiated a formal criminal investigation into the matter?

* What was the substance of these conversations?

*Did you instruct Mr. Rove to cooperate fully with the investigation?

* When you and Vice President Cheney were interviewed by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, did you and Mr. Cheney inform him of Karl Rove's involvement and your knowledge of it?

*You promised in 2004, after your alleged anger at Mr. Rove over his involvement, to fire anyone involved in the leak. If these new reports are true, given your 2004 promise, why did Karl Rove continue to work at the White House after you learned of his involvement?

* If these reports are true, when you learned of the involvement of Karl Rove in speaking about classified information, i.e. , the identity of a covert agent, what discussions took place about suspending Mr. Rove's security clearance? Why was it not suspended?

I--along with the American people--look forward to hearing you set the record straight on this important issue.

Respectfully,
Charles E. Schumer

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Cheney in a Spiral or Spiro?

VP's Office is Focus in Leak - Resignation Rumors Fly

Today's Washington Post reports that special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald has zeroed in on the role of Vice President Cheney's office in the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name to the media. The prosecutor has assembled evidence that suggests Cheney's long-standing tensions with the CIA contributed to the unmasking of Plame.

It didn't take long for rumors of a Cheney resignation to circulate. US News and World Report today reports that the vice president might step aside and that President Bush would elevate Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. A Bush insider commented: "It's certainly an interesting but I still think highly doubtful scenario . . . And if that should happen, there will undoubtedly be those who believe the whole thing was orchestrated - another brilliant Machiavellian move by the VP."

Were Cheney to step down he would be the third Vice President in US history to to do so -- the last being Spiro T. Agnew who resigned on October 10, 1973. It's certainly an interesting prospect, but what would motivate the VP to resign? Is his resignation part of a larger agenda? Could this be a first step toward a Condoleezza v. Hillary race in 2008? Or, a leak by Karl Rove to divert attention away from himself?

Only time will tell!

Monday, October 17, 2005

Action Alert - Contact 'Today Show'

NBC'S 'Today' Provides Platform for Defamatory Anti-Gay Attacks

GLAAD Alert ** Oct. 14, 2005

This GLAAD Alert and related video clips are available online at GLAAD.org


On Oct. 13, NBC's "Today" featured an interview with William Donohue, president of a far-right organization called the Catholic League -- who, during the course of the segment, repeatedly launched defamatory attacks against the gay community.

As one of three guests speaking about the Los Angeles Archdiocese's release of information on priests accused of sexual abuse, Donohue claimed that the crisis in the Catholic Church was "a homosexual scandal, not a pedophilia scandal" and later claimed that "It's homosexuals" who are responsible for the abuse.

[NOTE: To view video of Donohue's appearance on NBC's "Today" -- as well as a clip from a previous appearance on MSNBC where, during a discussion of the same topic, he attacked and insulted his fellow guests -- visit the GLAAD.org homepage at http://www.glaad.org .]

Since 2002, Donohue has opportunistically exploited the crisis in the Cathol! ic Church to link adult homosexuality (and gay people in general) with child sexual abuse - ignoring the fact that such abuse of power is not reflective of any healthy adult sexual orientation -- gay or straight.

As the Catholic Church continues to grapple with the abuse crisis, it remains important to acknowledge the men, women and children who have been the victims of intolerable sexual abuse by priests they trusted. And just as there is no excuse for any adult's sexual abuse of children (or a priest's sexual abuse of any parishioner), neither is it acceptable to claim that such abuse is in any way reflective of gay life, gay identity, or the majority of gay priests.

At one point, even Donohue seemed to realize he had crossed a line, hastily amending his second accusation that the abuse crisis was about "homosexuals" to add, "I'm not saying homosexuality causes someone to be a predator. That would be malicious."

Inviting Donohue to appear on the "Today" show, particularly given his history of anti-gay rhetoric and ill-mannered on-air behavior (as evidenced by Donohue's appearance on MSNBC in 2002, a video clip of which can be viewed at http://www.glaad.org) was simply irresponsible. And by not challenging Donohue's outrageous claims, "Today" show host Katie Couric gave unfortunate deference to a defamatory attack on the gay community and the vast majority of honorable gay priests.

"William Donohue's attacks are baseless, defamatory, calculated to fuel anti-gay sentiment -- and, unfortunately, exactly what people have come to expect from him," said GLAAD President Neil G. Giuliano. "T! he real question here is why, knowing all this, NBC would still allow itself to be used to promote Donohue's malicious smear tactics."

GLAAD contacted officials at NBC to voice our serious concerns about Donohue's appearance on the show. NBC representatives stated that Donohue's views were his own and not reflective of the network's.


TAKE ACTION NOW!

Please watch the videos at GLAAD.org and send an e-mail to the producers at NBC's "Today." Ask them to re-think how they cover the crisis in the Catholic Church and whom they invite to speak on behalf of the Catholic faith. Ask that they explain their decision to provide a platform for William Donohue's defamatory anti-gay attacks.

TO TAKE ACTION, visit GLAAD.org and click on "Take Action!"

Sunday, October 16, 2005

Your Government at Work

In case you don't subscribe, Truthout is distributing a couple of great articles today -- one on Bush-Cheney, the other on Abramoff-DeLay. Actually, the latter should read Abramoff-DeLay-Reed-Shelton (yes, religious right meets political right).

It's a long read, but well worth the time. After all -- it's your government at work!

-------------------------------------------------------------

Frank Rich: It's Bush-Cheney, Not Rove-Libby

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/101605Z.shtml

Asked repeatedly about Mr. Rove's serial appearances before a Washington grand jury, the jittery Mr. Bush, for once bereft of a script, improvised a passable impersonation of Norman Bates being quizzed by the detective in "Psycho." Like Norman he stonewalled. What makes Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation compelling, whatever its outcome, is its illumination of a conspiracy that was not at all petty: the one that took us on false premises into a reckless and wasteful war in Iraq. That conspiracy was instigated by Mr. Rove's boss, George W. Bush, and Mr. Libby's boss, Dick Cheney.

-------------------------------------------------------------

How the Abramoff-DeLay Machine Worked

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/101605Y.shtml

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his team were beginning to panic. An anti-gambling bill had cleared the Senate and appeared on its way to passage by an overwhelming margin in the House of Representatives. If that happened, Jack Abramoff's client, a company that wanted to sell state lottery tickets online, would be out of business. But on July 17, 2000, the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act went down to defeat, to the astonishment of supporters who included many anti-gambling groups and Christian conservatives.

Saturday, October 15, 2005

BAC Loves Buzz . . . and here's why

Just look at these links!

Key Participant in Bush Scripted, Rehearsed PR Stunt with GIs in Iraq was Actually a Military PR Spokesperson, Not a Regular Grunt. She was a "Ringer," Put in Place to Appear as a Regular GI, When She Is Actually a Pentagon Shill. There is Nothing Honest About the Bush Administration, Nothing at All.

Rove's Friday testimony lasted 4 1/2 hours. Fitzgerald isn't playing patty cake here, and the Rove team expects indictments -- rumors of violation of the Espionage Act, or perjury. "story has changed from the earliest days, when he told reporters he had nothing to do with the leak of Plame's name."

Casualties of the Bush Administration

What's not to love!

If you haven't checked them out I encourage you to visit www.buzzflash.com

Stifling Free Speech -- Your Tax Dollars at Work

Protest and Pushback on Campus

by RYAN GRIM
[posted online on October 12, 2005]


As a campus police officer put Tariq Khan in a chokehold, a lunchtime crowd at George Mason University began egging the officer on. Chants of "Kick his ass! Kick his ass!" were intermingled with cries of "Punch him!" "Kick him!" and "Take him down!" Two students--one had earlier ripped a sign off Khan's chest, the other had repeatedly called him a "pussy"--and a computer-lab staff member assisted the officer in "apprehending" Khan, as university spokesperson Dan Walsch put it, by piling on top of him and twisting his body until he cried out in pain.

Khan, 27, a four-year Air Force veteran and a junior at GMU, had been walking through the Johnson Center on September 29 when he saw a Marine recruiter. He made up a sign, "Recruiters lie. Don't be deceived," and silently stood next to the recruiter's table. Less than thirty minutes later he found himself in the chokehold. Backup police dragged Khan from the building, and one of them pulled out pepper spray. "I'm being nonviolent, and this officer is going to pepper-spray me! If you have a cell phone, please take a picture," Khan says he shouted. Aimee Wells, a junior and a library staffer, says she pulled out her camera-phone and the officer put away the canister, saying, "Don't worry. Nobody's getting pepper-sprayed today."

Khan, a sociology major, was taken to the Fairfax County jail and charged with disorderly conduct and trespassing. While there, he says, one officer told him, "You people are the most dangerous people in the world." Another officer, he says, warned him that if he didn't behave, "They'll hang you up by your feet." Police photographs show a bruised and bloodied Khan. A campus investigation is under way into the actions of the police, the staff member and the students, but no charges have yet been brought. "Buz" Grover, the balding, gray-ponytailed computer lab staffer who jumped on Khan and pulled his arm back, looks about six-foot-six and weighs maybe 280 pounds. "I assisted the officer," he said, "but beyond saying anything else I think I should consult with the university first.... Basically, someone doesn't want to take responsibility for his actions, and I'm not inclined to help them do that."

For the rest of the story . . .

Friday, October 14, 2005

Plamegate Wish List

The Most Corrupt Administration Ever

Joseph Wilson publicly criticized the Bush administration, saying it had twisted prewar intelligence on Iraq. The criticism came as the U.S. military engaged in a fruitless search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. As we all know, the existence of WMD's was the primary reason the administration gave to justify going to war.

So how did the administration respond? As they always do -- by using the power of the White House against a citizen who was simply telling the American public the truth. But they did it with an evil twist. Instead of retaliating directly against Wilson, the administration decided to retaliate against him by placing his wife in jeopardy.

Two senior administration officials -- Karl Rove and Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby -- leak to Bob Novak that Wilson's wife is a CIA operative, and that she had suggested her husband for a mission to Africa for the agency. The exposure of her name placed not only Valerie Plame in jeopardy, but also the lives of anyone working with her.

The level of corruption in this administration is so great it might be impossible to root it all out. A good place to start would be to indict and convict Rove and Libby and send them to prison for a very long time. The next step should be to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against Bush and Cheney.


________________________________
Read: Rove Testifies Again in CIA Leak Probe

Thursday, October 13, 2005

C. Delores Tucker - Amazing Leader

What a dynamic woman, and what a tremendous loss. I met C. Delores Tucker more than a decade ago. Her energy and passion for women's rights and civil rights was inspirational. And her amazing smile I'm sure disarmed many a foe. Pennsylvania has now lost two tremendous leaders -- C. Delores Tucker and Molly Yard.

________________________________________

Pennsylvania Democratic Party Mourns the Loss of Dr. C. Delores Tucker

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 13, 2005

Harrisburg -- Representative T. J. Rooney, Chairman of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party expressed his sorrow today at the passing of Dr. C. Delores Tucker, a leading civil rights activist, women's advocate and a member of the Democratic National Committee from Pennsylvania.

"Dr. Tucker was an extraordinary human being whose activism had a dramatic and far-reaching impact.

"Dr. Tucker was the first African American woman in the nation to serve as a Secretary of State. During her tenure, she instituted the first Commission on the State of Women in Pennsylvania. Dr. Tucker's activism includes the memorable Selma to Montgomery March in 1965 with Dr. Martin Luther King.? She was a leader in establishing the women's caucus to ensure that women had equal representation at all levels of the Democratic Party.

"The Democratic Party has lost a leader, a friend and a pioneer. On behalf of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, I extend our deepest sympathy to her family. She will be sadly missed for many, many years."

###

FEMA Continues to Fumble

$11 Million a Day Spent on Hotels for Storm Relief

The New York Times reports: "Straining to meet President Bush's mid-October deadline to clear out shelters, the federal government has moved hundreds of thousands of evacuees from Hurricane Katrina into hotel rooms at a cost of about $11 million a night, a strategy local officials and some members of Congress criticize as incoherent and wasteful."

The incompetence of this administration has been demonstrated time and time again -- and the American public seems to be catching on. Bush's approval ratings are the lowest of his five years in office. Even religious right conservatives -- Bush's base -- are questioning his actions.

The 2006 elections are not that far away. Hopefully the indictments against Rep. Tom DeLay, the problems facing Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, and a scandal ridden White House will be the motivation voters need to clean house!

Wednesday, October 12, 2005

Don't Ask ... Wait, DO Ask!

Bush's Faith-based Follies

The White House was quick to say John Roberts should not be asked questions about his religious beliefs. That same White House is now using religion as a reason to support Harriet Miers. Come on guys -- you can't have it both ways!

Read what Americans United for Separation of Church and State had to say:

White House Promotion Of Court Nominee Miers'
Religion Is Appalling, Says Americans United

Wednesday, October 12, 2005
Church-State Watchdog Group Rebukes Bush
For Hypocrisy Over Religion Issue


Could this be why Bush's approval numbers are plummeting?

Be careful what you ask for

o

Dick in Deep Doo-Doo?

Stories Tying Cheney Into Plamegate Developing

From BuzzFlash.com:

Is This Why We Haven't Been Seeing Much of Dick? Report: The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg are working on stories that point to Vice President Dick Cheney as the target of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's investigation into the leaking of CIA operative Valerie Plame's name. Stay Tuned...

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Bush Photo Op or Opps?

When a Photo Op Bites Back

Don't you just love it when a reporter actually asks the tough questions? The Today Show's Matt Lauer isn't my favorite interviewer, but he did a pretty good job with the President. Lauer asked the President if he was trying to get a second chance at a first impression, comparing the number of trips post-Rita with the disastrous federal response to Katrina.

Dan Froomkin, in a special piece for The Washington Post wrote:

It was such a lovely photo op -- President Bush and his wife joining the volunteers building a house in Louisiana. The perfect backdrop for an upbeat interview, live on NBC's Today Show.
But then Matt Lauer had to go and pull back the curtain and ask: Isn't this all just an empty photo op?


What ensued was an unusually testy interview, with Bush waving off more questions than he answered, chiding Lauer for quoting too many Democrats in his windups and making it clear that he would have been much happier fielding questions about the charitable nature of the American people than about politics.

Here's the text ; here's the video .

"Q So much more visibility on your part, President Bush, following Hurricane Rita and, as I mentioned, the eight trips to the region, as compared to what was seen as a slow and inefficient federal response after Hurricane Katrina. Is this one of those situations where you're trying to get a second chance to make a good first impression?"

"PRESIDENT BUSH: I do my job as best I can. One of the things that we do is we respond to crisis. And as I told the people, if I didn't respond well enough, we're going to learn the lessons. If there's any mistakes made at the federal level, I, of course, accept responsibility for them. . . .

"Q I talked to a prominent Democrat in Louisiana who has said that this type of appearance, while it's great to see you guys rolling up your sleeves and grabbing a hammer and helping with this piece of wall here, that it's a photo op, and they want to see a plan on paper, your plan to rebuild this region. Do you have that kind of a plan?

"THE PRESIDENT: Well, Matt, you see, I don't think Washington ought to dictate to New Orleans how to rebuild. I guess we have a different philosophy than whoever the prominent Democrat was you spoke to. Last night, Laura and had dinner with Mayor Nagin and a group of distinguished New Orleans citizens from all walks of life. And my message to them was, we will support the plan that you develop.

"The point is, is that it comes from the local folks. And I recognize there's an attitude in Washington that says, we know better than the local people. That's just not the attitude I have."

Later, after Lauer began quoting another Democrat who has criticized the lack of a forgiveness clause in the administration's loan package for hurricane recovery, Bush interrupted and said, only half-jokingly: "You're quoting a lot of Democrats today, Matt, that's interesting."

Bush kept trying to turn the interview into more of a feel-good session. "I think our job is to elevate this whole process out of normal politics," he said.

When Lauer asked whether that was really possible, Bush shot back: "It depends on who asks the questions, I guess."

For the rest of the story.

Monday, October 10, 2005

Randi vs The Church Lady


You Can't Handle the Truth

Randi Rhodes gets into it with religious right activist Janet Parshall over terrorism and New York City. Parshall uses the talking point of "we're fighting them over there rather than over here" nonsense. Randi quickly points her to the NYC subway scare. Watch Janet's response. Some people just can't stand the truth.

Sunday, October 9, 2005

Don't Bet on Bennett's Honesty

Bennett Blames Media, Should Blame Self

No one forced former Education Secretary William Bennett to make a racist comment on his Morning in America radio program. No one threatened to cause him harm if he refused to make such a sweeping statement condemning all African Americans. Bennett has no one to blame but himself.

On the September 28 broadcast of
Bill Bennett's Morning in America, syndicated by Salem Radio Network to approximately 115 radio stations with an estimated weekly audience of 1.25 million listeners, this is what Bennett said:

CALLER: I noticed the national media, you know, they talk a lot about
the loss of revenue, or the inability of the government to fund Social
Security, and I was curious, and I've read articles in recent months here,
that the abortions that have happened since Roe v. Wade, the lost revenue
from the people who have been aborted in the last 30-something years,
could fund Social Security as we know it today. And the media just doesn't
-- never touches this at all.

BENNETT: Assuming they're all productive citizens?

CALLER: Assuming that they are. Even if only a portion of them were, it
would be an enormous amount of revenue.

BENNETT: Maybe, maybe, but we don't know what the costs would be, too.
I think as -- abortion disproportionately occur among single women? No.

CALLER: I don't know the exact statistics, but quite a bit are, yeah.

BENNETT: All right, well, I mean, I just don't know. I would not argue for
the pro-life position based on this, because you don't know. I mean, it cuts
both -- you know, one of the arguments in this book Freakonomics
that they make is that the declining crime rate, you know, they
deal with this hypothesis, that one of the reasons crime is down is
that abortion is up. Well --

CALLER: Well, I don't think that statistic is accurate.

BENNETT: Well, I don't think it is either, I don't think it is either, because first
of all, there is just too much that you don't know. But I do know that it's true
that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole
purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your
crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous,
and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go
down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive
extrapolations are, I think, tricky.

Bennett is now trying to blame the media for the controversy surrounding his remarks, claiming news outlets distorted his remarks about aborting black babies.

In an Associated Press report Bennett claims: "I was putting forward a bad argument in order to put it down . . . they reported and emphasized only the abhorrent argument, not my shooting it down."

Bennett certainly has an odd way of "shooting" something down when he states "I do know that it's true."

Saturday, October 8, 2005

The Naked Truth

Raw power play strips president's credibility -- naked truth revealed

From the White House, to Congress, to the streets there seems to be a rash of 'naked' crime. Take for example a fellow in Arizona accused of trying
to burglarize a home while naked. He stopped mid-escape to ask the victim for a pair of shorts and was latter arrested next door, apparently trying to steal a car, wearing only the shorts he had 'borrowed.'

The same week, South Carolina police responding to an alarm discovered
a naked man who dropped from the ceiling and then attempted to run out the door. The man claimed he was just there to retrieve his lost keys. It seems the man needed to remove his clothing in order to slip into the building through an air vent on the roof.

And in Oregon, a registered sex offender
who fashioned a loin cloth from a rope and piece of lawn furniture was arrested near a high school. The nearly-naked fellow had approached four girls asking for a ride to a motel or to the mall (possibly to purchase clothing?). The girls wisely left the scene and alerted authorities who captured the man, still wearing his make-shift loin cloth and covered in fecal matter. Gives an all new meaning to being in deep sh**.

So by now you must be wondering what this has to do with the president.


It's been said of Bush that the emperor has no clothes, and the Miers nomination seems to have confirmed it. Miers is unfit for the office to which she has been nominated and Bush is, in the words of Hans Christian Andersen, "unpardonably stupid." And, because Bush nominated Miers to the Supreme Court he is now in deep doo-doo with religious right conservatives.

For decades religious right activists have organized and built an infrastructure that they thought would lead to a takeover of not only the federal government, but ultimate the Supreme Court. In the 80's one of the most compelling reasons given for supporting Ronald Reagan for president was that he would provide conservatives the opportunity to reshape the Court.

Since the 1973 Roe v Wade decision, religious right conservatives have had the Supreme Court in their sights. They saw control of the court as a way to insure their vision for America would be in place for at least a generation -- ending abortion, and later the movement for gay rights.

Bush wasn't the top choice of religious right conservatives in 2000, but with some arm twisting they were convinced he was the candidate with the best chance to win. So being good foot soldiers they fell into place.

They gave their support to Bush again in 2004, and how has he chosen to repay them? By passing up the opportunity to elevate Scalia or Thomas to Chief Justice and giving them a nominee for the swing seat that has no clear paper trail on abortion.

When questioned on the selection Bush's only response seems to be trust me.

Conservative pundits are furious. And progressives are none too happy either. What progressive could support a woman who thinks Bush is the most brilliant man she has ever known?

So there you have it, the naked truth.

Thursday, October 6, 2005

Madison, Miers and Church-State Separation

Religious Activism, Church-State Separation and why I Love Molly Ivins

I can't remember how long I've loved Molly Ivins -- I just know that I do.

The first time I heard her in person she talked about a church-state separation issue in Texas. It seems someone decided to place a nativity scene in the Capitol Rotunda.

Calling around to various elected officials for comment, the only person in their office was Ann Richards, who I believe Molly said was state treasurer at the time. Molly asked Ann what she thought about having a nativity scene inside the Capitol and without missing a beat Richards responded, "gee, it might be the only way to get three wise men in that building!"

In
Ivins latest column she is again talking about the importance of church-state separation, and how George W. Bush just doesn't get it.

The paper trail on Harriet Miers is slim, but we do know two things for sure. She adores Bush and she is part of a very small circle of people he seems to trust. So, when times are tough -- as they are in the White House right now -- go with a loyalists.

As Ivins says: ". . .it's Bunker Time at the White House. Miers' chief qualification for this job is loyalty to George W. Bush and the team.

"Miers, like Bush himself, is classic Texas conservative Establishment, with the addition of Christian fundamentalism."


So there we have it. Another member of the religious right, in line for one of the top legal seats in the country. But, as Ivins comments, is Miers another religious activist?

If you don't think that's an important question for the Senate Judiciary Committee to uncover consider what
Ivins writes in her column: "Separation of church and state is in the Constitution because this country was founded by people who had experienced both religious persecution and state-supported religions . . .Nevertheless, we are now beset by people who insist on dragging religion into governance -- and who themselves believe they are beset by people determined to "drive God from the public square."

"This division has been in part created, and certainly aggravated, by those seeking political advantage. It is a recipe for an incredibly damaging and serious split in this country, and I believe we all need to think long and carefully before doing anything to make it worse.

"As an 1803 quote attributed to James Madison goes: "The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries."

As the Senate considers Miers it would serve them, and us, well if they kept Madison's words in mind.

Wednesday, October 5, 2005

Pinch me, I must be dreaming!

The plot thickens in Plamegate

I was once told the reason I get along so well with gay men is because I know show tunes. Well, the lyrics that came to mind as I read Michael Tomasky's story online in The American Prospect were: Could it be, yes it could, somethings coming, something good, if I can wait. . .

Tomasky had me at hello, when he opened his piece with: "Think it’s fair to say that the combination Sunday of the Walter Pincus-Jim VandeHei piece in The Washington Post and George Stephanopoulos’ bombshell on television’s This Week felt like a tug on the noose around the White House’s neck?"

From his lips to God's ear!

Part of an administration that has benefited from tragedy (well, until Bush met Katrina) I had decided that Karl Rove must be the luckiest man alive. The one, two and then three punch of the Roberts nomination, Katrina, and Rita seemed to have knocked Plamegate off the media radar screen -- but it appears (thank goodness) I was wrong.

At some point, SOMEONE in this corrupt administration has got to pay a price for their actions. Someone needs to go directly to jail, no passing GO, and no collecting "no-bid" contracts.

Proposed bill redefines "Married, with Children"

State bill would limit procreation assistance

For decades feminists have been warning that a government that can take away abortion rights can also take away the right to have a child. In Indiana, State Senator Patricia Miller is attempting to do just that.

Miller chairs the Health Finance Commission, a committee that will vote on October 20 on whether or not to recommend legislation that explicitly regulates who can (and cannot) seek assistance in conceiving a child. According to Miller, only married couples -- one man and one woman -- should be allowed to have procreation assistance.

The Journal Gazette, in Fort Wayne, reports that: ". . .the part of the bill raising eyebrows involves assisted reproduction.


It defines assisted reproduction as causing pregnancy by means other than sexual intercourse, including intrauterine insemination, donation of an egg, donation of an embryo, in vitro fertilization and transfer of an embryo, and sperm injection.

The bill then requires "intended parents" to be married to each other and specifically says an unmarried person may not be an intended parent."

The report goes on to say: "Some of the required information includes the fertility history of the parents, education and employment information, hobbies, personality descriptions, verification of marital status, child care plans, letter of reference and criminal history checks."

Single and want to have a child? Lesbian or gay and want to conceive or have a surrogate conceive? If this bill becomes law, forget about it!

Quick, someone give Senator Miller a copy of the Constitution!

Tuesday, October 4, 2005

The Trouble with Harry

More Reason for Concern about Miers

David Sirota commented on The Huffington Post: "In case anyone thought Harriet Miers wasn't a corporate-shill-in-White-House-clothing, take a gander at how
Miers did her best Ken Lay impression while heading a major Texas corporate law firm. That's right, according to the 5/1/00 newsletter Class Action Reporter, Miers headed Locke, Liddell & Sapp at the time the firm was forced to pay $22 million to settle a suit asserting that "it aided a client in defrauding investors."

"The
details of the case are both nauseating and highly troubling, considering President Bush is considering putting Miers at the top of America's legal system. . . . "

Apparently this happened a few times during her tenure, which begs the question is it a 'Texas' thing or a 'Friends of Bush' thing?

The more radical fringe of the conservative movement seems a little nervous about Miers, but progressives should not read too much into that. Religious right leaders like James Dobson seem to have come into the fold. Dobson told The New York Times, "
I have reason to believe she is pro-life," but would not elaborate further.

In the same article, Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court, testified to her evangelical Christian faith and devoted participation in the theologically conservative Valley View Christian Church in Dallas. Hecht has assured conservatives Miers is "pro-life" and has attended "pro-life" events with him.

Today's big news

It's being reported today that Miers may have briefed Bush on the famous Bin Laden memo -- the one that stated Osama Bin Laden was "determined" to attack the US homeland, perhaps with hijacked planes.

Pictured above is US Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers reviewing daily briefing papers with Bush at his Crawford ranch on August 6, 2001. Did the papers include the infamous Bin Laden memo? Maybe questioning Senators should ask.

Monday, October 3, 2005

Will a second indictment smash "The Hammer"?

DeLay Indicted AGAIN

The Associate Press is reporting that
Tom DeLay has been indicted AGAIN! What is this, Christmas in October?

Austin, Texas - A Texas grand jury indicted Rep. Tom DeLay on

a new charge of money laundering Monday, less than a week
after another grand jury leveled a conspiracy charge that forced
DeLay to temporarily step down as House majority leader.

Both indictments accuse DeLay and two political associates of
conspiring to get around a state ban on corporate campaign
contributions by funneling the money through a political action
committee to the Republican National Committee in Washington.

The RNC then sent back like amounts to distribute to Texas
candidates in 2002, the indictment alleges.

The new indictment came hours after DeLay's attorneys filed a
request to dismiss the case. That request argued that the
conspiracy charge was based on a law that was not effective
until 2003, the year after the alleged money transfers.

One can only hope that Tom's exit from Congress won't be DeLay(ed) much longer!

Comment that disqualifies Miers for Supreme Court

What Women Want to Know about Miers

Obviously, feminist women (and men) want to know where Harriet Miers stands on Roe v Wade.
With virtually no paper trail, it will take a certain amount of creativity to ascertain the answer.

ABC News reported that her limited record suggests she
opposes Roe.

  • While active in the Texas American Bar Association in late 1990's, she was a leader of an unsuccessful movement to get the organization to rescind its pro-choice positions and support for taxpayer-funded abortion for poor women.
  • In 1989 Miers donated $150 to a Texas pro-life group.
  • And on a related issue -- in a White House internet session last year Miers was asked about research using stem cells from human embryos and described the process this way: "...taking one life to save another presents moral and ethical issues..."

Religious Right web sites note that Miers has been a member of Valley View Christian Church in Dallas for 25 years, a "conservative evangelical church" according to one of the church's elders.

But one comment, above all others, should disqualify Miers for the nations top court. The one where she said Bush was "the most brilliant man" she had ever met.

Definition of Cronyism

Press Hammers McClellan over Bush's Nomination of Miers

by Andy Ostroy - The Ostroy Report
Monday, October 03, 2005

At today's White House daily press briefing, Scott McClellan faced tough questions from the media about President Bush's nomination of Harriet "Clean Slate" Miers as the new Supreme Court justice to replace the retiring Sandra Day O'Connor. ABC's Terry Moran asked McClellan if Bush appointing his personal lawyer, someone with no experience on the bench, is "not the definition of cronyism, what is?" McClellan defended Bush's selection, saying Miers is a highly qualified individual and cited her impressive list of credentials (that's sarcasm here, folks) which include two terms on the Dallas City Council, a stint on the Texas Lottery Commission, her law career, and years as both Bush's personal lawyer and White House Counsel. By these and similar standards, NYC's Council President Gifford Miller deserves a crack at the black robe.

As Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) said today, we know less about Miers than we did John Roberts Jr. And that's quite troubling. She is a veritable blank slate. A Bush crony with no discernible opinions and positions on critical issues like abortion, church and state, school prayer, etc. What we do know about her is that she vehemently fought to defeat a 1992 American Bar Association resolution supporting 1973's landmark Roe v Wade decision. At issue was not whether she herself supported the ruling, but whether or not the ABA should take a position. However, where there's smoke, there's usually fire.

Perhaps as time passes we'll keep learning more and more about Miers and how she may serve the court. Until then, on the surface, her nomination just seems like more blatant cronyism, with Bush rewarding mediocrity with the most powerful positions in the nation.

posted by The Ostroy Report

Single, white female

Quiet but Ambitious White House Counsel Makes Life of Law

By Michael A. Fletcher
Washington Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

Ask White House counsel Harriet Miers when she first met George W. Bush, and she is less than specific. "I met him on a variety of occasions over the course of time," she replied recently, explaining their long-ago encounters in the social and power corridors of Texas. "But not in a memorable way."

Ask her what it was like to be the first woman elected president of the Texas Bar Association, and she invokes not gender, but the geographic rivalry that frequently underlies bar elections in the state. "It was a very vigorous campaign against a lawyer from Houston," said Miers, who is from Dallas.

Ask what motivated her to seek election to the Dallas City Council in the late 1980s, she says only: "I was asked to run." Ask why she bowed out after one term, and she is only a bit more expansive. The structure of the council had changed, she explains, converting her citywide seat into one representing one district. That did not suit her interest, so she moved on. "It was a natural progression," she said.

Miers's reticence is not to be mistaken for a lack of assertiveness or ambition. Rather, friends and associates say, it reflects her scrupulous discretion and selflessness -- the same qualities that propelled her rise through the legal ranks and into President Bush's inner circle.

"The thing that comes to mind when I think of Harriet is that she basically puts her clients' interests ahead of everything, including her own personal life, sleeping hours and all those things," said Jerry Clements, a partner at Locke Liddell & Sapp, the 400-lawyer Texas firm where Miers was a co-managing partner before coming to Washington. "She is defined by hard work, dedication and client loyalty."

Miers's low-key but high-precision style is particularly valued in a White House where discipline in publicly articulating policy and loyalty to the president are highly valued. Formerly Bush's personal lawyer in Texas, Miers came with him to the White House in 2001 as staff secretary, the person who screens all the documents that cross the president's desk. She was promoted to deputy chief of staff before Bush named her counsel after his reelection in November. She replaced Alberto R. Gonzales, another longtime Bush confidant, who was elevated to attorney general.

"Harriet Miers is a trusted adviser on whom I have long relied for straightforward advice," Bush said at the time. "Harriet has the keen judgment and discerning intellect necessary to be an outstanding counsel."

When he was governor of Texas, Bush offered a less formal assessment at an awards ceremony, calling Miers "a pit bull in size 6 shoes." The line stuck, in no small part because it described her cool but dogged determination.

As White House counsel, Miers describes herself as lawyer to the presidency and the president. It is a job that has an impact on almost every major decision made in the White House, although most of the work is performed in the shadows -- at least until controversy erupts. Gonzales faced sharp questioning at his confirmation hearing for attorney general about his role in shaping policies that some critics said led to the torture and abuse of detainees at U.S. military facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan and at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Working with her staff of 13 lawyers, and in cooperation with the Justice Department, Miers's office provides guidance on issues from the legal parameters for the war on terrorism to presidential speeches. Her office also takes the lead in vetting and recommending candidates for the federal judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court.

With Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist suffering from thyroid cancer and widely expected to step down after the court term ends this month, it is the counsel's office that has taken the lead in evaluating prospective replacements. The work started just after Bush took office in 2001, when lawyers in the office began compiling court opinions, law review articles, speeches and other works of prospective judges so the office would be ready to make recommendations should an opening occur on the high court.

That work has taken on new urgency with Rehnquist's weakened condition -- something Miers does not care to discuss.

"There's no vacancy, so I don't think it is appropriate to talk about it," she said when the question of the Supreme Court vetting process arose.

The office also has played a pivotal role in recommending federal appeals court candidates to Bush. Senate Democrats blocked 10 of the president's 34 appeals court nominees during his first term, saying they were too extreme in their conservatism. That prompted Senate Republicans to threaten to change the rules to disallow filibusters of judicial candidates.

The march toward the so-called nuclear option was stopped only after a bipartisan agreement by 14 senators saved the filibuster but allowed some of Bush's most controversial nominees to win Senate confirmation. The deal provides for the filibuster to be used only under "extraordinary circumstances," while calling on the White House to consult more closely with the Senate before forwarding nominees.

But Bush has said that the White House is not part of the agreement, a view Miers echoes.

"It doesn't change what we do," said Miers, who said she routinely talks to senators about possible nominees. The candidates the president put forward, she said, "deserve an up-or-down vote."

Born and raised in Dallas, Miers, 59, is a graduate of Southern Methodist University, where she majored in mathematics. She went on to law school at SMU, earning her law degree in 1970 and going on to clerk for a federal judge in Dallas. In an era when there were few female lawyers, Miers set out for the top.

According to published reports, she was the first woman hired by Locke Purnell Boren Laney & Neely, a Dallas firm whose history extends to the 1890s. She went on to become a top commercial litigator whose clients included Microsoft and the Walt Disney Co.

Miers, who is not married and does not have children, was active in professional organizations and eventually was elected head of the Dallas and Texas bar associations, where she was known for encouraging members to do pro bono work.

If Miers encountered any gender bias along the way, she is not one to talk about it. "She is one of those people who just decides, 'I'm going to do a good job and good work and good results will win out over any biases people may have,' " said Clements, a fellow female lawyer who regards Miers as a trailblazer. "She just overcame any obstacles with hard work and dedication and being a very good trial lawyer."

Miers met Bush in the 1980s, and was drafted to work as counsel for his 1994 gubernatorial campaign. In 1995, he appointed her to the Texas Lottery Commission. After working as a lawyer in Bush's presidential campaign, she came to Washington with him in 2001.

"I remember seeing him in her office many years ago, before he was governor, before he was running for anything," Clements said. "So it's been a long relationship and a very loyal relationship. She really is one of those people that the practice of law and all things associated with that really has been her life."

Bush taps Harriet Miers for Top Spot

Harriet Miers Biography

Harriet Miers serves as Counsel to the President. Most recently, she served as Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff, and prior to that she was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary.

Before joining the President’s staff, she was Co-Managing Partner at Locke Liddell & Sapp, LLP from 1998-2000. She had worked at the Locke Purnell, Rain & Harrell firm, or its predecessor, from 1972 until its merger with the Liddell Sapp firm. From 1995 until 2000, she was chair of the Texas Lottery Commission. In 1992, Harriet became the first woman president of the Texas State Bar, and in 1985 she became the first woman president of the Dallas Bar Association. She also served as a Member-At-Large on the Dallas City Council.

Harriet received both her undergraduate and law degrees from Southern Methodist University.

Sunday, October 2, 2005

Spin City. . .this just in

o

The $190,000 Question

Grand juror: DeLay evidence is there
'Stacks of papers' support indictment, foreman says;
U.S. Rep. says there's no case

By CHRISTY HOPPE / The Dallas Morning News
Saturday, October 1, 2005

AUSTIN – Grand jurors were presented a load of evidence, including testimony and phone records, that led them to believe Rep. Tom DeLay should be tried on a conspiracy charge, the leader of the Travis County grand jury that indicted the congressman said Friday.

"It was not one of those sugarcoated deals that we handed to [District Attorney] Ronnie Earle," William M. Gibson said.

He added: "Mr. Earle has stacks and stacks of papers – evidence of telephone calls from Mr. DeLay and everybody."

Mr. DeLay has said that Mr. Earle has no evidence to prove that he tried to subvert Texas election laws. The Sugar Land Republican's lawyers did not return calls seeking comments on Mr. Gibson's description of the grand jury proceedings.

The indictment stems from the activities of Texans for a Republican Majority, a political action committee created by Mr. DeLay. The group, known as TRMPAC, is accused of trying to circumvent Texas laws that make it illegal to use corporate or union money in political campaigns.

Labeling it a money laundering scheme, Mr. Earle says that TRMPAC took $190,000 in corporate donations and routed it – along with the names of seven Statehouse candidates – to the Republican National Committee in September 2002. The RNC then sent out $190,000 in contributions to those same seven candidates, who couldn't legally have accepted corporate money.

At the heart of the conspiracy charge against Mr. DeLay is whether he knew about the transaction. Experts on Texas law say that knowledge alone might be all that is needed for a conviction under state law.

Mr. DeLay, who stepped down as House majority leader when the indictment was issued Wednesday, and his lawyers say he knew nothing about the money exchange at the time it happened and that the indictment is a political vendetta against him.

But in the first public acknowledgements of what evidence against Mr. DeLay might exist, Mr. Gibson, a 76-year-old former sheriff's deputy and state insurance investigator, said there were ample indications of the congressman's involvement.

He said that Mr. DeLay provided the district attorney with a written statement that was given to the grand jury to consider but that Mr. DeLay declined to sign a sworn document or testify under oath.

Mr. DeLay "just gave a statement saying he did nothing. And he didn't know how that money got back down here and all that stuff," Mr. Gibson said. "We believe different from other paperwork we got."

He added, "I am very much convinced that he had" knowledge of the transaction.

Action called proper

DeLay attorney Dick DeGuerin disputed that assertion.

"He had knowledge of it after it happened," Mr. DeGuerin said immediately after the Wednesday indictment. "It wasn't something that he did in advance, or suggested, or anything like that."

Mr. DeLay's legal team also questions the money laundering charge, asserting that corporate money was legally accepted by the RNC and a different $190,000 – from a separate, noncorporate account – was distributed to state representative candidates.

"These corporate contributions were not illegal. They were made properly at the proper time and they were spent for proper things," Mr. DeGuerin said.

Lawsuit

TRMPAC already has lost a lawsuit brought by losing Democratic candidates over how $600,000 raised from corporations was used against them.

In May, state District Judge Joe Hart ruled that the Democrats were damaged by TRMPAC's improper use of corporate money.

"TRMPAC as a whole was an illegal entity," said Cris Feldman, a lawyer representing the Democrats.

He also pointed out that in the ruling, Judge Hart weighed the $190,000 transaction and included it as part of the improper donations, which was used to determine the damage award.

"It's implicit recognition that it was money laundering," Mr. Feldman said.

TRMPAC, which is now defunct, has denied the allegations and is appealing the verdict.

Agreement at issue

While DeLay lieutenants John Colyandro and Jim Ellis were charged with money laundering, Mr. DeLay was charged only with conspiracy – but that statute casts a wide net in Texas.

"The basic [criminal] conduct is agreeing," said University of Texas law professor George E. Dix, who has written books about criminal procedures in Texas. "The defendant must agree with one or more persons, and then one or more of them participates in an action that is a felony."

He said under most circumstances, a person is considered part of a conspiracy even if he or she didn't realize the act they agreed upon was illegal.

"From my understanding, whether or not Mr. DeLay or any defendant believed the conduct he intended to be committed was criminal or not is irrelevant," Mr. Dix said.

Technically under the law, all he had to do was agree to a transaction that turned out to be illegal, he said.

60-day limit

State law also bars directly or indirectly making a corporate contribution to a political party 60 days before a general election. The $190,000 check from TRMPAC to the RNC was delivered within that range.

In e-mails included in the record of the lawsuit, Mr. Ellis and Mr. Colyandro were aware of the 60-day limit. But Mr. Colyandro's research showed that the restriction didn't apply because the contribution was from TRMPAC and not the corporations directly.

"So we are in good shape," Mr. Ellis wrote at the time.

Some legal experts said that if Mr. DeLay knew of the donation prior to its delivery, that would be enough to show that he was knowledgeable about a felony about to be committed.

But Mr. DeGuerin disputes that line of reasoning.

"Whenever the contact was with Tom DeLay and Jim Ellis, it was not that Tom DeLay was calling the shots or that Jim Ellis was trying to get his approval. But again, what Jim Ellis did, and what John Colyandro did, was not a violation of the law. Nobody broke the law," Mr. DeGuerin said.

But Mr. Gibson said there's enough to suggest to the contrary.

"As far as we're concerned, they presented us enough evidence and witnesses that we felt we were on the right track," he said. "I would not have put my name on that grand jury indictment unless I felt we had ample probable cause."