Helen Thomas Returns to White House

WELCOME BACK!


Helen Thomas has been part of the White House Press Corp for seven presidents. President Elect Barack Obama will be her eighth. I know I feel more comfortable knowing she is there asking the tough questions. Good to see you back!

Why I Love Helen Thomas

Check out the look on White House Press Secretary Dana Perino's face as she calls on Helen Thomas. Perino looks like she is about to throw up ... as she should.


This post is very after-the-fact, but I just watched the above video and HAD to put it up for a couple of reasons. First: I love Helen Thomas. She may be the ONLY investigative journalist left in this country. And second: This is yet another example of how blatantly this administration has lied to us.

Listen to the exchange, particularly this section near the end:

THOMAS: "You are denying in this room that we torture, that we have tortured?"

PERINO: "I am denying that."

One has to wonder how Perino can say that with a straight face considering the evidence.

... this is the first time sources have disclosed that a handful of the most senior advisers in the White House explicitly approved the details of the program. According to multiple sources, it was members of the Principals Committee that not only discussed specific plans and specific interrogation methods, but approved them. [...]

At the time, the Principals Committee included Vice President Cheney, former National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell, as well as CIA Director George Tenet and Attorney General John Ashcroft.

I must agree with Ms. Thomas, who appears at the end to be asking the other reporters in the room to step up to the plate: "where is everybody ... for God sakes"

I'd like to know that, too!

Helen Thomas tells Sen. Clinton "Hang in There"

In the spirit of full disclosure, I am a HUGE Helen Thomas fan. I've had the privilege of meeting her a few times, and I think she may be the ONLY real investigative journalist left in this country.

Here is what Ms. Thomas has to say about the Democratic contest:

Hillary Clinton should hang in there and run a good race.

And she has vowed to do so.

Clinton has been under unprecedented pressure to bow out of the divisive Democratic primary and to clear the field for her opponent -- Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois.

Among those who want her to throw in the towel are, of course, Obama's supporters. But many other Democrats are trying to push her out of the contest on the ground that a contentious race can hurt the party and could help their Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain of Arizona.

Clinton also has been deserted by some fair-weather friends such as New Mexico's Gov. Bill Richardson, who held two Cabinet appointments during her husband's presidency. [...]

Obama has captivated the enthusiastic support of America's youth and ignited their interest in presidential politics. His eloquent speeches are designed for the bully pulpit. But does a good speech make a good president?

Obama stresses he was against the invasion of Iraq, but he doesn't say he was not in the Senate when it was initiated. Since become a senator, he has twice voted to fund the war.

I am still trying to find the key that has made Obama a prime candidate for the presidency, and to understand what he has done for the country beyond his middle-of-the-road political moves to make his name known and to steer clear of hot-button issues.

The Rev. Martin Luther King had a dream, too. But he acted on it. He went to jail, he marched, he led. [...]

A Feb. 20-24 New York Times-CBS poll found that 48 percent of respondents said the news media were tougher on Clinton compared with 43 percent, who thought the media were tougher on Obama.

You don't need to be a rocket scientist to see that the major newspaper columnists are giving Obama a free ride, while trashing Clinton. Likeability undoubtedly goes a long way with them, and he has mesmerized the media.

Clinton, on the other hand, has left herself open to criticism for dubious involvement in foreign policy decisions in the Clinton years. But one can't deny that she was there and that her opinion was respected.

Obama can be forgiven for acting like a front-runner, but not for his patronizing remarks such as: "My attitude is that Senator Clinton can run as long as she wants."

Even Clinton has the audacity of hope -- and why not?